Advertisement
Editorial

Ghostwriting Revisited: New Perspectives but Few Solutions in Sight

  • Published: August 30, 2011
  • DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001084
  • Published in PLOS Medicine

Reader Comments (14)

Post a new comment on this article

Subverted or followed?

Posted by AdamJacobs on 31 Aug 2011 at 08:33 GMT

authorship standards have been subverted
http://plosmedicine.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001084#article1.body1.sec1.p4

This is a strange conclusion. Current authorship standards, as laid down by ICMJE, simply do not allow someone whose only role was providing medical writing assistance to be listed as an author. Clearly Matheson disapproves of that situation, but the situation is what it is. It seems strange then, if pharmaceutical companies follow those guidelines and list medical writers in acknowledgements rather than authors, to say that the guidelines are being "subverted". I would rather say that the guidelines are being "followed".

Competing interests declared: As above