Advertisement
Research Article

A New Troodontid Theropod Dinosaur from the Lower Cretaceous of Utah

  • Phil Senter mail,

    psenter@uncfsu.edu

    Affiliation: Department of Biological Sciences, Fayetteville State University, Fayetteville, North Carolina, United States of America

    X
  • James I. Kirkland,

    Affiliation: Utah Geological Survey, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States of America

    X
  • John Bird,

    Affiliation: College of Eastern Utah Prehistoric Museum, Price, Utah, United States of America

    X
  • Jeff A. Bartlett

    Affiliation: College of Eastern Utah, Price, Utah, United States of America

    X
  • Published: December 15, 2010
  • DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0014329
  • Published in PLOS ONE

Abstract

Background

The theropod dinosaur family Troodontidae is known from the Upper Jurassic, Lower Cretaceous, and Upper Cretaceous of Asia and from the Upper Jurassic and Upper Cretaceous of North America. Before now no undisputed troodontids from North America have been reported from the Early Cretaceous.

Methodology/Principal Findings

Herein we describe a theropod maxilla from the Lower Cretaceous Cedar Mountain Formation of Utah and perform a phylogenetic analysis to determine its phylogenetic position. The specimen is distinctive enough to assign to a new genus and species, Geminiraptor suarezarum. Phylogenetic analysis places G. suarezarum within Troodontidae in an unresolved polytomy with Mei, Byronosaurus, Sinornithoides, Sinusonasus, and Troodon + (Saurornithoides + Zanabazar). Geminiraptor suarezarum uniquely exhibits extreme pneumatic inflation of the maxilla internal to the antorbital fossa such that the anterior maxilla has a triangular cross-section. Unlike troodontids more closely related to Troodon, G. suarezarum exhibits bony septa between the dental alveoli and a promaxillary foramen that is visible in lateral view.

Conclusions/Significance

This is the first report of a North American troodontid from the Lower Cretaceous. It therefore contributes to a fuller understanding of troodontid biogeography through time. It also adds to the known dinosaurian fauna of the Cedar Mountain Formation.

Introduction

The family Troodontidae and its sister family Dromaeosauridae make up the clade Deinonychosauria [1]. Deinonychosauria, the sister taxon to Avialae, is a member of the theropod clade Coelurosauria [1]. Members of Troodontidae are gracile bipeds with an enlarged ungual on the second toe of each foot. They have been reported from the Upper Jurassic and Lower Cretaceous of China [2][5], the Lower and Upper Cretaceous of Mongolia [6][9], and the Upper Cretaceous of North America [10]. A tooth from the Upper Jurassic Morrison Formation of Utah has been referred to Troodontidae [11], but this assignment has been questioned [1]. A coelurosaurian skeleton from the Morrison Formation of Wyoming is possibly troodontid [12], but to date a description has not been published. Before now, no description has been published of an undisputed troodontid from North American sediments that predate the Late Cretaceous. Here we report the discovery of a troodontid maxilla from the basal Cedar Mountain Formation (Lower Cretaceous, Barremian?) of Utah.

Methods

Phylogenetic Analysis

We entered data from the new specimen into a phylogenetic data matrix of Coelurosauria from a recent study [13] (Appendix S1). All characters were left unordered. The non-coelurosaurian theropods Dilophosaurus, Allosaurus, and Sinovenator were used as outgroups. The matrix from that study [13] was based on one published previously [14] but included updates and corrections that are delineated and justified elsewhere [13]. Phylogenetic analysis was performed with PAUP 4.0 for Windows [15]. A heuristic search with 1000 random addition-sequence replicates was performed, with no limit to “maxtrees.”

Results

Systematic Paleontology

Systematic hierarchy:

Dinosauria Owen, 1841 [16]

Saurischia Seeley, 1887 [17]

Theropoda Marsh, 1881 [18]

Coelurosauria von Huene, 1914 [19]

Troodontidae Gilmore, 1924 [20]

Geminiraptor gen. nov.

urn: lsid:zoobank.org:act:57057FD5-AB25-43F1-​A9AA-C3C2E51B0C9F

Geminiraptor suarezarum sp. nov.

urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:4B950765-6016-4​FC8-96ED-2219112C6E48

Holotype.

The holotype specimen is CEUM (College of Eastern Utah Prehistoric Museum, Price Utah) 7319, a maxilla (Fig. 1).

thumbnail

Figure 1. Maxilla of Geminiraptor suarezarum.

(A)—Lateral view. (B)—Cranial view. (C)—Medial view. (D)—Ventral view. Scale bar = 10 mm. alv = dental alveoli, iof = internal antorbital fenestra, mxf = maxillary fenestra, pf = promaxillary fenestra.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0014329.g001
Etymology.

The species name refers to Drs. Celina and Marina Suarez, the twin geologists who discovered the Suarez site. The genus name is from the Latin geminae (“twins,” in honor of the Suarez sisters) and raptor (“one who seizes or takes by force,” a common part of deinonychosaurian genus names).

Locality and horizon.

The specimen is from the Suarez site [21], a dinosaur bonebed (dominated by the therizinosauroid Falcarius) in the lower Yellow Cat Member (Lower Cretaceous: Barremian?) [22] of the Cedar Mountain Formation (Fig. 2). The site is in western Grand County, Utah.

thumbnail

Figure 2. Stratigraphic setting of Geminiraptor suarezarum.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0014329.g002
Diagnosis.

Troodontid possessing a maxilla with extensive pneumatization internal to the antorbital fossa, inflating the bone so that it has a triangular cross-section; a large, craniocaudally elongate maxillary fenestra; a promaxillary fenestra that is visible in lateral view; craniocaudally narrow promaxillary strut and interfenestral strut; small, square dental alveoli with bony septa between them.

Specimen Description

The maxilla is craniocaudally long and dorsoventrally low. The process dorsal to the external antorbital fenestra is horizontal, as in the troodontids Byronosaurus [8], Saurornithoides [9], and Zanabazar [9] (Fig. 3). The cranial tip of the maxilla is missing, as is the portion of the bone ventral to the internal antorbital fenestra. The preserved portion of the maxilla is 95 mm long, 30 mm tall, and 20 mm wide at the sixth preserved alveolus. Due to preservation, it is not possible to determine whether the maxilla participated in the border of the external naris.

thumbnail

Figure 3. Comparison of the maxilla of Geminiraptor suarezarum to those of other paravians.

Maxillae are drawn from photos by P.S. of AMNH (American Museum of Natural History, New York City, New York) FR 6515 (Velociraptor), IVPP V 12615 (Sinovenator), IVPP V 11527 (Sinusonasus), CEUM 7319 (Geminiraptor), IGM (Mongolian Institute of Geology, Ulaan Baatar, Mongolia) 100/983 (Byronosaurus), AMNH FR 6516 (Saurornithoides), and IGM 100/1 (Zanabazar); and reference 18 (Archaeopteryx).

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0014329.g003

The antorbital fossa occupies a large portion of the lateral surface of the maxilla cranial to the internal antorbital fenestra, as in other troodontids [2], [4], [8], [9], dromaeosaurids [23][26], and the basal bird Archaeopteryx [27]. The promaxillary fenestra is visible in lateral view, as in Archaeopteryx [27], dromaeosaurids [23][26], the basal troodontid Sinovenator [2], and the troodontid Sinusonasus [4]. In contrast, the promaxillary fenestra has been lost or has become confluent with the maxillary fenestra in the troodontids Saurornithoides and Zanabazar [9]. In Geminiraptor the promaxillary fenestra is situated at the cranial end of the antorbital fossa. Infilling by matrix prevents determination of its exact dimensions, but the height of the opening is 8 mm or less. The maxillary fenestra of Geminiraptor is a large, craniocaudally elongate oval, as in Troodon, Saurornithoides, and Zanabazar [9], [10]. It is 27 mm long and 10.4 mm high. As in most other deinonychosaurs [2], [3], [4], [23][26] the fenestra does not reach the cranial margin of the antorbital fossa. In this respect Geminiraptor differs from Troodon, Saurornithoides, and Zanabazar, in which the maxillary fenestra reaches the cranial margin of the antorbital fossa [9], [10]. The promaxillary strut, the vertical bar of bone between the promaxillary fenestra and the maxillary fenestra, is craniocaudally narrow in Geminiraptor, as in Sinovenator [2] and unlike the craniocaudally wide promaxillary strut of Sinusonasus [4]. In Geminiraptor the interfenestral strut, the vertical bar of bone between the maxillary fenestra and the internal antorbital fenestra, is not recessed inward from the lateral surface of the maxilla. The strut is craniocaudally narrow as in Sinovenator [2] and Sinusonasus [4] and unlike the craniocaudally wide interfenestral strut in Byronosaurus, Saurornithoides, and Zanabazar [8], [9].

The maxilla of Geminiraptor suarezarum is remarkable in that it is inflated medially by a large pneumatic chamber that gives the maxilla a triangular cross-section such that there is a broad, ventrally convex shelf lingual to the tooth row. The bone surrounding this cavity is only ~2 mm thick. Such extensive pneumatization of this part of the maxilla is unreported in any other theropod except Byronosaurus. In Byronosaurus the medial wall of the inflated portion is vertical, so a triangular cross-section is absent [8]. In other theropods the maxillary antrum (the space within the inflated area) communicates with the maxillary fenestra [28], although obscuration by matrix prevents confirmation of this in Geminiraptor. In Geminiraptor the maxillary antrum appears to be closed off from the nasal cavity by a thin medial wall, as is the case in other coelurosaurs [28], including other troodontids [8], [9].

The preserved portion of the maxilla includes alveoli for nine small teeth, dorsal to which is a row of neurovascular foramina on the lateral surface of the maxilla. After comparison with the maxillae of other deinonychosaurs, we estimate that the complete maxilla held at least three more teeth in the missing cranial part and at least seven more in the missing caudal part. The alveoli are square in occlusal view. No tooth crowns or roots are preserved. The alveoli are closely spaced but separated by complete septa. This is significant because in most other troodontids complete septa are absent [10], [29][31], although P.S. has observed that they are present in the basal troodontid Sinovenator changii, IVPP (Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology, Beijing, China)V 12615. There is no break between the septa and the labial surface of the maxilla and therefore no discrete interdental plates.

Phylogenetic Analysis

The phylogenetic analysis found 1944 trees of 1285 steps. For these trees the consistency index is 0.3416, the homoplasy index is 0.6537, the retention index is 0.7711, and the rescaled consistency index is 0.2670. The strict consensus tree places G. suarezarum within Troodontidae in an unresolved polytomy with Mei, Byronosaurus, Sinornithoides, Sinusonasus, and the clade Troodon + (Saurornithoides + Zanabazar) (Fig. 4). Successive outgroups to this polytomy are the troodontid Sinovenator, the troodontid Anchiornis, Dromaeosauridae, and Avialae. Outside Troodontidae the topology of the tree is identical to that found by the latest study that used the present data matrix [13], as is the decay index (Bremer support) at all nodes but one. As in the latest analysis [13], the decay index is a robust 8 for Paraves, a robust 4 for Deinonychosauria, 1 for Troodontidae, and 1 for Troodon + (Saurornithoides + Zanabazar). The decay index dropped from 3 in the previous analysis [13] to 1 in the current analysis, at the node uniting Sinovenator with troodontids other than Anchiornis. This drop likely reflects the huge amount of missing data for Geminiraptor.

thumbnail

Figure 4. Phylogeny of coelurosaurian theropod dinosaurs, showing phylogenetic position of Geminiraptor suarezarum.

See text for details of phylogenetic analysis.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0014329.g004

Geminiraptor is united with troodontids other than Anchiornis by presence of a large number of small teeth (character 85, state 1); the plesiomorphic condition, present in Anchionis and most other theropods, is a small number of larger teeth (state 0). Geminiraptor is united with troodontids other than Anchiornis and Sinovenator by the presence of a maxillary fenestra in the form of a large, craniocaudally elongate oblong (character 240, state 1); in Anchiornis, Sinovenator, and most other theropods the maxillary fenestra is large and round (state 0) (Fig. 3). A maxillary fenestra in the form of a large, craniocaudally elongate oblong is unknown outside Troodontidae. Also, the general shape of the maxilla, with its long, low profile, is similar to that of advanced troodontids (Fig. 3), and the bone exhibits no morphology that is inconsistent with troodontid affinity. The presence of interdental septa is shared with Sinovenator and non-troodontid theropods and is consistent with a relatively basal position within the family.

Discussion

The discovery of G. suarezarum adds to the known diversity of the dinosaur fauna of the Cedar Mountain Formation. As the only Lower Cretaceous troodontid reported from North America it also increases the known temporal distribution of the family on the continent. It was already known that troodontids were present in Asia and North America during the Late Jurassic [5], [12] and the Late Cretaceous [8][10], and we now know that they were present on both continents during the Early Cretaceous as well. This indicates that the family underwent multiple transcontinental dispersal events through its history. However, there are not yet enough data to determine the direction of dispersal or the family's continent of origin

Geminiraptor is considerably larger than other Early Cretaceous troodontids [2][4], [6] and Jurassic troodontids [5] and is similar in size to the Late Cretaceous troodontids Byronosaurus [8], Troodon [10], Saurornithoides [9], and Zanabazar [9]. Its presence in the Early Cretaceous therefore demonstrates that the larger body size characteristic of Late Cretaceous troodontids had already appeared in the Early Cretaceous.

Nomenclatural Acts

The electronic version of this document does not represent a published work according to the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature (ICZN), and hence the nomenclatural acts contained herein are not available under that code from the electronic edition. A separate edition of this document was produced by a method that assures numerous identical and durable copies, and those copies were simultaneously obtainable (from the publication date listed on page 1 of this article) for the purpose of providing a public and permanent scientific record, in accordance with Article 8.1 of the Code. The separate print-only edition is available on request from PLoS by sending a request to PLoS ONE, 145 Berry Street, Suite 3100, San Francisco, CA 91407, USA along with a check for $10 (to cover printing and postage) payable to “Public Library of Science”.

This published work and the nomenclatural acts is contains have been registered in ZooBank (http://www.zoobank.org), the proposed online registration system for the ICZN. The ZooBank LSIDS (Life Science Identifiers) can be resolved to the associated information viewed through any standard web browser by appending the LSID to the prefix “http://zoobank.org/”.

Supporting Information

Appendix S1.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0014329.s001

(0.16 MB DOC)

Acknowledgments

We thank Don DeBlieux for his detailed preparation of this delicate fossil. P.S. thanks the following people for access to specimens in their care: Daniel Brinkman (Yale Peabody Museum), Carl Mehling, Mark Norell (American Museum of Natural History), Xu Xing, and Zheng Fang (Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology). We also thank the following people for helpful reviews: Martha Hayden, Mike Lowe, Michael Hylland, Andrew Farke, Peter Makovicky, and Sunny Hwang. We also thank Andrew McDonald and David Wharton for help with Latin. The discovery of the site took place during part of a project funded by the Utah Geological Survey and a Discovery Channel Quest Grant to J.I.K.

Author Contributions

Analyzed the data: PS. Wrote the paper: PS JK. Performed field work: JK. Performed lab work: JB JAB.

References

  1. 1. Makovicky PJ, Norell MA (2004) Troodontidae. In: Weishampel DB, Dodson P, Osmólska H, editors. The Dinosauria, Second Edition. Berkeley: University of California Press. pp. 184–195.
  2. 2. Xu X, Norell MA, Wang X, Makovicky PJ , Wu X (2002) A basal troodontid from the Early Cretaceous of China. Nature 415: 780–784.
  3. 3. Xu X, Norell MA (2004) A new troodontid dinosaur from China with avian-like sleeping posture. Nature 431: 838–841.
  4. 4. Xu X, Wang X (2004) A new troodontid (Theropoda: Troodontidae) from the Lower Cretaceous Yixian Formation of western Liaoning, China. Acta Geol Sin-Engl 78: 22–26.
  5. 5. Hu D, Hou L, Zhang L, Xu X (2009) A pre-Archaeopteryx troodontid theropod from China with long feathers on the metatarsus. Nature 461: 640–643.
  6. 6. Russell D, Dong Z (1993) A nearly complete skeleton of a new troodontid dinosaur from the Early Cretaceous of the Ordos Basin, Inner Mongolia, People's Republic of China. Can J Earth Sci 30: 2163–2173.
  7. 7. Barsbold R, Osmólska H, Kurzanov SM (1987) On a new troodontid (Dinosauria, Theropoda) from the Early Cretaceous of Mongolia. Acta Palaeontol Pol 32: 121–132.
  8. 8. Makovicky PJ, Norell MA, Clark JM, Rowe T (2003) Osteology and relationships of Byronosaurus jaffei. Am Mus Novit 3402: 1–32.
  9. 9. Norell MA, Makovicky PJ, Bever GS, Balanoff AM, Clark JM, Barsbold R, Rowe T (2009) A review of the Mongolian Cretaceous dinosaur Saurornithoides. Am Mus Novit 3654: 1–63.
  10. 10. Currie PJ (1985) Cranial anatomy of Stenonychosaurus inequalis (Saurischia, Theropoda) and its bearing on the origin of birds. Can J Earth Sci 22: 1643–1658.
  11. 11. Chure DJ (1994) Koparion douglassi, a new dinosaur from the Morrison Formation (Upper Jurassic) of Dinosaur National Monument; the oldest troodontid (Theropoda: Maniraptora). BYU Geol Stud 40: 11–15.
  12. 12. Hartman S, Lovelace D, Wahl W (2005) Phylogenetic assessment of a maniraptoran from the Morrison Formation. J Vertebr Paleontol 25: 67A–68A.
  13. 13. Senter P (2010) Using creation science to demonstrate evolution: application of a creationist method for visualizing gaps in the fossil record to a phylogenetic study of coelurosaurian dinosaurs. J Evolution Biol 23: 1732–1743.
  14. 14. Senter P (2007) A new look at the phylogeny of Coelurosauria (Dinosauria: Theropoda). J Syst Palaeontol 5: 429–463.
  15. 15. Swofford DL (2001) PAUP*. Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (*and Other Methods). Sunderland: Massachusetts, Sinauer Associates. Version 4.0b10 for 32-Bit Microsoft Windows.
  16. 16. Owen R (1841) Report on British fossil reptiles, part II. Report of the eleventh meeting of the British Association for the Advancement of Science. London: John Murray. pp. 60–204.
  17. 17. Seeley (1887) On the classification of the fossil animals commonly named Dinosauria. P R Soc London 63: 165–171.
  18. 18. Marsh OC (1881) Principal characters of American Jurassic dinosaurs. Part V. Am J Sci 21: 417–423.
  19. 19. von Huene F (1914) Das natürliche System der Saurischia. Centralbl Min Geol Paläontol Abt B 1914: 154–158.
  20. 20. Gilmore CW (1924) On Troodon validus, an ornithopodous dinosaur from the Belly River Cretaceous of Alberta, Canada. Bull Dept Geol Univ Alb 1: 1–43.
  21. 21. Kirkland JI , Madsen SK (2007) The Lower Cretaceous Cedar Mountain Formation, eastern Utah: the view up an always interesting learning curve. Ut Geol Assoc Publ 35: 1–108, CD-ROM.
  22. 22. Greenhalgh BW, Britt BB (2007) Stratigraphy and sedimentology of the Morrison-Cedar Mountain boundary, east-central Utah. In: Willis GC, Hylland MD, Clark DL, Chidsey TC Jr, editors. Central Utah: diverse geology of a dynamic landscape. Salt Lake City: Utah Geological Association. pp. 81–100.
  23. 23. Osborn HF (1924) Three new Theropoda, Protoceratops Zone, central Mongolia. Am Mus Novit 144: 1–12.
  24. 24. Ostrom JH (1969) Osteology of Deinonychus antirrhopus, an unusual theropod from the Lower Cretaceous of Montana. Pea Mus Nat Hist Bull 31: 1–165.
  25. 25. Xu X , Wu X (2001) Cranial morphology of Sinornithosaurus millenii Xu et al. 1999 (Dinosauria: Theropoda: Dromaeosauridae) from the Yixian Formation of Liaoning, China. Can J Earth Sci 38: 1739–1752.
  26. 26. Makovicky PJ, Apesteguía S , Agnolín FL (2005) The earliest dromaeosaurid theropod from South America. Nature 437: 1007–1011.
  27. 27. Mayr G, Pohl B, Hartman S , Peters DS (2007) The tenth skeletal specimen of Archaeopteryx. Zool J Linn Soc-Lond 149: 97–116.
  28. 28. Witmer LM (1997) The evolution of the antorbital cavity of archosaurs: a study in soft-tissue reconstruction in the fossil record with an analysis of the function of pneumaticity. Soc Vertebr Paleontol Mem 3: 1–73.
  29. 29. Currie PJ (1987) Bird-like characteristics of the jaws and teeth of troodontid theropods (Dinosauria, Saurischia). J Vertebr Paleontol 7: 72–81.
  30. 30. Norell MA, Hwang SH (2004) A troodontid dinosaur from Ukhaa Tolgod (Late Cretaceous, Mongolia). Am Mus Novit 3446: 1–9.
  31. 31. Bever GS, Norell MA (2009) The perinate skull of Byronosaurus (Troodontidae) with observations on the cranial ontogeny of paravian theropods. Am Mus Novit 3657: 1–51.