Research Article

HIV and the Risk of Direct Obstetric Complications: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

  • Clara Calvert mail,

    Affiliation: Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom

  • Carine Ronsmans

    Affiliation: Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom

  • Published: October 04, 2013
  • DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0074848
  • Published in PLOS ONE



Women of reproductive age in parts of sub-Saharan Africa are faced both with high levels of HIV and the threat of dying from the direct complications of pregnancy. Clinicians practicing in such settings have reported a high incidence of direct obstetric complications among HIV-infected women, but the evidence supporting this is unclear. The aim of this systematic review is to establish whether HIV-infected women are at increased risk of direct obstetric complications.

Methods and findings

Studies comparing the frequency of obstetric haemorrhage, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, dystocia and intrauterine infections in HIV-infected and uninfected women were identified. Summary estimates of the odds ratio (OR) for the association between HIV and each obstetric complication were calculated through meta-analyses. In total, 44 studies were included providing 66 data sets; 17 on haemorrhage, 19 on hypertensive disorders, five on dystocia and 25 on intrauterine infections. Meta-analysis of the OR from studies including vaginal deliveries indicated that HIV-infected women had over three times the risk of a puerperal sepsis compared with HIV-uninfected women [pooled OR: 3.43, 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.00–5.85]; this figure increased to nearly six amongst studies only including women who delivered by caesarean (pooled OR: 5.81, 95% CI: 2.42–13.97). For other obstetric complications the evidence was weak and inconsistent.


The higher risk of intrauterine infections in HIV-infected pregnant and postpartum women may require targeted strategies involving the prophylactic use of antibiotics during labour. However, as the huge excess of pregnancy-related mortality in HIV-infected women is unlikely to be due to a higher risk of direct obstetric complications, reducing this mortality will require non obstetric interventions involving access to ART in both pregnant and non-pregnant women.


The substantial burden of HIV infection amongst women of reproductive age in sub-Saharan Africa and the maternal health risks that these women are challenged with has lead to HIV and maternal mortality being described as two intersecting epidemics [1], [2]. Many pregnant women in this region face not only the threat of dying from the direct complications of pregnancy and delivery, but also from complications arising from advancing HIV disease. Given this intersection, it is important to understand whether and how HIV interacts with pregnancy.

The biological interaction between HIV and pregnancy is not well understood. It has been argued that pregnancy may accelerate HIV progression as pregnancy is associated with suppressed immune function independent of HIV status [3], [4]. However, the epidemiological evidence supporting this hypothesis is weak. A systematic review investigating the effects of pregnancy on HIV progression and survival found no evidence that pregnancy increased progression to an HIV-related illness or a fall in CD4 count to fewer than 200 cells per cubic millilitre. The same review showed weak evidence that pregnant women were more likely to progress to an AIDS-defining illness or death compared with their non-pregnant counterparts but this was based on only six studies [5].

Clinicians working in settings where HIV is highly prevalent have reported a high incidence of direct obstetric complications in HIV-infected pregnant women [6]. Some researchers have also hypothesised that HIV may increase the risk of direct obstetric complications, though the evidence was based on very few studies with small sample sizes [2], [7]. There are several biological pathways which may explain such an association. Firstly, the compromised immune status and general poor health of HIV-infected women may leave them more vulnerable to infections, including puerperal sepsis [8]. Secondly, it has been suggested that HIV-related thrombocytopenia, where there is a low platelet count in the blood, may increase a woman's risk of haemorrhage [9]. Additionally, social factors such as poor access to healthcare increase a woman's risk of obstetric complications, and may be exacerbated in HIV-infected women due to the discrimination and stigma these women face in some settings [10].

To date there has been no effort to synthesise the empirical evidence on the association between HIV and direct obstetric complications. The aim of this study is to investigate whether HIV increases the risk of obstetric complications, by systematically reviewing literature which compares the risk of obstetric complications in HIV-infected and uninfected women. The obstetric complications which were pre-specified for this review are obstetric haemorrhage, pregnancy-induced hypertension, dystocia and intrauterine infections.


Search Strategy

Pubmed, Embase, Popline and African Index Medicus were searched up to 6th July 2011 using search terms for HIV, pregnancy and the following direct obstetric complications: obstetric haemorrhage, pregnancy-induced hypertension, dystocia and intrauterine infections (see Supplementary File S1 for the full search strategy). There were no language or publication date restrictions. All abstracts were reviewed by a single author (CC) and a 20% sample of abstracts was independently reviewed by a second researcher. Full text copies of potentially relevant papers were obtained and the reference lists of review articles and articles which were included in this systematic review were searched for further relevant publications.

Eligibility Criteria

Studies were eligible for inclusion if they compared the occurrence of direct obstetric complications during pregnancy, delivery and/or up to 365 days postpartum between HIV-infected and uninfected women using a cohort, cross-sectional or case-control design. Obstetric complications relevant for this review were categorised as: obstetric haemorrhage (including placenta praevia, placental abruption, antepartum haemorrhage, peri- or postpartum haemorrhage and retained placenta); pregnancy-induced hypertension (including eclampsia and pre-eclampsia); dystocia (including prolonged or obstructed labour, abnormal presentation and uterine rupture); and intrauterine infections (including puerperal sepsis, wound infection and endometritis). Studies were required to have a sample size of at least 30 women in each study group with no restrictions on country, dates or whether the study was population or facility based.

Data Extraction and management

Data were extracted by a single author (CC) on: study location, dates, design and population, definition and ascertainment of the obstetrical outcome (e.g. whether haemorrhage was ascertained through visual estimate or actual measurement of blood loss), the mode of delivery, gestational age at recruitment and length of postpartum follow-up, HIV prevalence in the study population, whether antiretroviral therapy (ART) was available, the number of women with the obstetric complication by HIV status, the type of denominator (pregnancy, live births or women) and the denominator.

Study populations described in more than one paper were included only once, using data from the paper with the most detailed information. When more than one obstetrical outcome was evaluated in a single study, these were extracted and treated as separate data sets.

Assessment of risk of bias

The risk of bias for each data set was assessed using the component approach adopted by The Cochrane Collaboration [11]. All data sets were assessed on the definition and ascertainment of the obstetric complication, the completeness of data, adjustment for confounding and selection of the comparison group. Each of the quality criteria were classified as having a low risk or high risk of bias for each data set. For example, a data set was classified as having a high risk of bias for outcome ascertainment if methods which were likely to lead to cases being missed were used (e.g. hospital record review). Where there was insufficient information to assess the risk of bias, the data set was classified as at an unclear risk of generating bias.

Statistical Methods

All analyses were carried out using STATA 12.0. The association between HIV and each obstetric complication was estimated using odds ratios (OR). Summary measures of effect for each obstetric complication were obtained by conducting a random-effects meta-analysis of the best effect estimate available from each study. Where an adjusted OR was available from the paper, this was taken as the best estimate; otherwise the crude estimate was used. Articles do not generally state whether there is overlap between categories of obstetric complications, for example, whether the women who have puerperal sepsis are also the women who are included as having endometritis. We therefore only provide summary estimates for sub-categories within each broad obstetric grouping. As the effect of HIV on the obstetric complications may vary by the mode of delivery, studies which included either vaginal deliveries only or both vaginal and caesarean deliveries were considered separately from studies which only included caesareans. Publication bias was assessed using funnel plots and was formally tested using Begg's test [12].

Additionally, for data sets which included vaginal and caesarean section deliveries, a meta-analysis was conducted to assess whether HIV-infected women had increased odds of caesarean. ORs were computed for each study rather than each data set.


Search Strategy Results

We initially identified 18,949 titles and abstracts and 1,291 of these were retained for full text review (Figure 1). Of the 1,291 articles, 1,247 were excluded as they did not contain relevant data. A total of 44 studies, providing 66 data sets, were included. Seventeen data sets contained information on obstetric haemorrhage (one caesarean only study), 19 on hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (one caesarean only study), five on dystocia and 25 data sets contained information on intrauterine infections (12 caesarean only studies and one study which was stratified by mode of delivery and therefore provided two data sets).


Figure 1. Flow chart of study selection for inclusion in the systematic review.

1After removal of duplicates 2Articles may have been excluded for multiple reasons.


Study Characteristics

Table 1 describes the 51 eligible data sets based on vaginal deliveries or all modes of delivery. The 15 data sets which only included women undergoing a caesarean section are described in Table 2. Overall, study populations were from Spain, [13][15] France, [16] the UK, [17] Germany, [18] Holland, [19] Italy, [20] the USA, [21][27] Mexico, [28] Dominican Republic, [29] Brazil, [30], [31] Kenya, [32][35], Ethiopia, [36] Rwanda, [37], [38] Uganda, [39][41] Nigeria, [42][44] Zimbabwe, [45] South Africa, [46][50] India, [51], [52] and Thailand [53], [54]. One study was conducted in Italy, Spain, Sweden, Poland and Ukraine [55] and another was conducted in Malawi, Tanzania and Zambia [56]. All studies were conducted in health facilities. Thirty-four of the data sets (52%) were conducted when ART was available in the study population.


Table 1. Summary of studies of HIV and obstetric complications which included births by vaginal delivery.


Table 2. Summary of studies of HIV and obstetric complications which only looked at births by caesarean section.


Risk of Bias Within and Between Data Sets

The assessment of the risk of bias is summarised in Tables 3 and 4. Only 23 of the 66 data sets provided a definition for the obstetric complication: from eight of the 19 data sets (42%) reporting on hypertensive disorders to seven amongst the 25 data sets (28%) for intrauterine infections. The risk of bias in the ascertainment of obstetric complications cases was judged to be high for 29 of the 66 data sets; most of which relied on medical records to ascertain the nature of the complication.


Table 3. Risk of bias within studies which include vaginal deliveries.


Table 4. Risk of bias within caesarean section studies.


Very few studies had sufficient information on the completeness of the data to enable the risk of bias to be assessed and only 17 of 66 data sets were classified as at low risk of bias. In particular, studies relying on medical records tended not to report how many records had to be excluded due to missing information (e.g. HIV status).

Overall, 25 of 66 data sets either adjusted for confounders in their analysis or matched the HIV-infected and uninfected women with respect to some key confounders. The majority of the data sets (58 of 66) were judged to be at low risk of bias in the selection of the comparison group of HIV-uninfected women.

There was no evidence of publication bias for any of the outcomes included in the analysis with the exception of pre-eclampsia (p = 0.01) (Supplementary material, Figure S1).

Effect of HIV on obstetric haemorrhage

The prevalence of antepartum haemorrhage was higher in HIV-infected than uninfected women in four out of five data sets (Table 1). Meta-analysis indicated that HIV-infected women have double the odds of antepartum haemorrhage [summary odds ratio (OR): 2.06, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.42–2.97] (Figure 2). There was no evidence for between-study heterogeneity (I2: 27.5%, p-value = 0.24). Based on three data sets, there was no evidence for an association between HIV and either placenta praevia (summary OR: 1.02, 95% CI: 0.33–3.14, I2: 0%, p-value = 0.70) or placental abruption (summary OR: 1.61, 95% CI: 0.12–20.79, I2: 76.1%, p-value = 0.02) (Figure 2).


Figure 2. Forest plot showing the strength of association between HIV and obstetric haemorrhage in studies with vaginal deliveries only or included both vaginal deliveries and c-section deliveries.


Thirteen data sets compared the prevalence of postpartum haemorrhage in HIV-infected and uninfected women with ORs ranging from 0.25 to 11.18. The meta-analysis suggests there is no evidence that HIV increases the odds of postpartum haemorrhage (summary OR: 1.28, 95% CI: 0.69–2.38, I2: 53.4%, p = 0.01). Similarly, there was no evidence for increased odds of retained placenta with HIV infection (summary OR: 1.28, 95% CI: 0.80–2.06, I2: 0%, p = 0.50).

One study looked at the association between HIV and postpartum haemorrhage amongst women undergoing a caesarean section (Table 2). There was no evidence of an association between HIV and postpartum haemorrhage (OR: 0.44, 95%CI: 0.19–1.04).

Effect of HIV on hypertensive disorders of pregnancy

Out of the 11 data sets with data on pregnancy-induced hypertension, eight found that HIV-infected women were at increased risk of pregnancy-induced hypertension (Table 1). The meta-analysis showed some evidence for increased odds of pregnancy-induced hypertension with HIV infection (summary OR: 1.46, 95% CI: 1.03–2.05). However, there was strong evidence for between-study heterogeneity (I2: 79.3%, p-value<0.001) (Figure 3).


Figure 3. Forest plot showing the strength of association between HIV and hypertensive diseases of pregnancy.

*Adjusted odds ratio.


Nine data sets examined the association between HIV and pre-eclampsia; four of these found a higher prevalence in HIV-infected women than uninfected women. There was no evidence that HIV infection was associated with pre-eclampsia (summary OR: 1.04, 95% CI: 0.60–1.79, I2: 70.5%, p-value = 0.001).

The ORs from the four data sets comparing the prevalence of eclampsia in HIV-infected and uninfected women varied from 0.39 to 38.47. The meta-analysis produced a summary OR of 2.56, however the confidence intervals were very wide (95% CI: 0.15–44.11) and there was strong evidence for between-study heterogeneity (I2: 96.6%, p-value<0.001).

There was one data set from Nigeria which was restricted to caesarean sections. There was no evidence of an association between HIV and postpartum pregnancy-induced hypertension (OR: 0.33, 95%CI 0.01–8.21).

Effect of HIV on dystocia

There were only six data sets where the outcome could be broadly categorised as dystocia (Table 1, Figure 4). One data set from Rwanda found no association between HIV and dystocia (OR: 1.04, 95% CI 0.59–1.82), whilst a study from Thailand indicated that HIV-infected women have nearly eight times the odds of prolonged labour compared with uninfected women (OR: 7.86, 95% CI: 4.64–13.33). Two data sets reported on abnormal presentation, and there was no evidence for an association between HIV and abnormal presentation in the meta-analysis (summary OR: 1.17, 95% CI: 0.68–2.03, I2: 0%, p = 0.50). Conversely, both data sets which compared the prevalence of uterine rupture showed an increased risk in HIV-infected women, giving a summary OR of 3.14 (95% CI: 1.51–6.50, I2:0%, p = 0.89).


Figure 4. Forest plot showing the strength of association between HIV and dystocia.

*Adjusted odds ratio.


Effect of HIV on intrauterine infections

Figure 5 shows the association between HIV and intrauterine infections. Meta-analysis based on four data sets indicated that HIV-infected women have over three times the odds of having puerperal sepsis compared with uninfected women (summary OR 3.43, 95% CI: 2.00–5.85, I2: 9.4%, p-value = 0.35). There was also evidence from eight data sets that HIV-infected women had over 2.5 times the risk of endometritis compared with uninfected women (summary OR 2.51, 95% CI: 1.50–4.21, I2: 19.6%, p-value = 0.27).


Figure 5. Forest plot showing the strength of association between HIV and intrauterine infection.


The results of the meta-analyses for women who had a caesarean section are presented in Figure 6. The pooled OR from four data sets indicated that HIV-infected women had nearly six times higher odds of suffering from puerperal sepsis compared with their uninfected counterparts (summary OR 5.81, 95% CI: 2.42–13.97, I2: 0%, p-value = 0.93). Amongst the ten data sets which contained information on wound infection, the pooled OR was 1.75 (95% CI: 1.20–2.55) although there was weak evidence for between-study heterogeneity (I2: 30.1%, p = 0.17). Finally, there were 12 studies which looked at endometritis in HIV-infected and uninfected women; nine found a higher occurrence in HIV-infected women. The meta-analysis showed that HIV-infected women had over double the odds of endometritis than uninfected women (OR: 1.86, 95% CI: 1.28–2.71). There was good evidence for between-study heterogeneity (I2: 47.0%, p = 0.04).


Figure 6. Forest plot showing the strength of association between HIV and intrauterine infection in studies which only looked at caesarean deliveries.

*Adjusted odds ratio.


Caesarean section

Of the studies which included vaginal and caesarean section deliveries, 13 did not provide information on the proportion of HIV-infected and uninfected women who had a caesarean (one stated that there was no difference in the mode of delivery in HIV-infected and uninfected women, one was restricted to only vaginal deliveries, three only followed women during pregnancy and eight did not provide any information on the proportion of infected and uninfected women having caesareans). Figure 7 shows the relative odds of having a caesarean for HIV-infected compared with uninfected women across the 19 studies which provided data. The ORs varied from 0.40 to 5.55 and there was no evidence that HIV-infected women were more likely to have a caesarean compared with uninfected women [pooled OR: 1.20, 95% CI: 0.81–1.78]. However, there was strong evidence for between-study heterogeneity (I2: 88.4%, p<0.001).


Figure 7. Forest plot showing the strength of association between HIV and caesarean section in studies included in this systematic review.



Our systematic review suggests that HIV increases the risk of intrauterine infections during pregnancy, delivery or the postpartum. Studies including vaginal and caesarean deliveries indicated that HIV-infected women had over three times the risk of a puerperal sepsis compared with uninfected women; this figure increased to nearly six amongst studies only including women who delivered by caesarean. The evidence for an association between HIV and other direct obstetric complications was inconsistent. Whilst HIV was associated with an increased risk of antepartum haemorrhage, there was no evidence of an increased risk of placenta praevia, placental abruption, postpartum haemorrhage or retained placenta. Similarly, HIV did appear to increase the risk of pregnancy-induced hypertension, but not of pre-eclampsia and eclampsia. Finally, we found an association between HIV and both uterine rupture and prolonged labour, but not between HIV and other complications of dystocia.

The higher risk of intrauterine infections in HIV-infected women is biologically plausible, as the immune suppression associated with HIV increases susceptibility to infection [57]. Caesarean sections may increase the risk of postpartum infection, but caesarean sections were equally common in HIV-infected and uninfected women, and the excess risk of intrauterine infections in HIV-infected women persisted among caesarean only deliveries. Whether the excess risk of endometritis and puerperal sepsis in the intra- and postpartum period is directly attributable to the pregnancy or indirectly related to HIV or AIDS-associated infections is uncertain. Intrauterine infections were mostly ascertained from hospital records, definitions were lacking, it was not always clear whether the infection was diagnosed during pregnancy or the postpartum and microbiological examination was not done. The signs and symptoms suggestive of endometritis and puerperal sepsis in intra- or postpartum women may have been a direct consequence of the increased prevalence of sexually transmitted infections associated with HIV [58], [59]. In the 2008–2010 confidential enquiries into maternal deaths in South Africa, only 6% of maternal deaths in HIV-infected women were attributed to pregnancy-related sepsis, while 62% of deaths were attributed to non-pregnancy-related infections [60]. Without clear definitions misclassification of non-pregnancy-related infections as pregnancy-related, or vice versa, cannot be excluded.

We did not find a consistent association between HIV and the risk of either haemorrhage, dystocia or hypertensive diseases of pregnancy. HIV-related thrombocytopenia affects around 10% of HIV-infected individuals and 30% of individuals with AIDS, [61][63] but it rarely leads to severe bleeding [61], [63]. The association between HIV and uterine rupture, concomitant with no association between HIV and other categories of dystocia, may suggest that delayed care seeking in HIV-infected women plays a role. However, this finding was based on two studies only, and caution is required in its interpretation. The observed associations between HIV and broadly defined categories of complications such as antepartum haemorrhage or hypertensive diseases – whereas no association was found between HIV and more narrowly defined clinical diagnoses such as placenta praevia, placental abruption, pre-eclampsia or eclampsia – suggests that measurement errors may have occurred. Unfortunately, few studies provided information on the number of women with more than one diagnosis, and we were not able to pool findings within the broad obstetric categories.

The lack of an association between HIV and caesarean section is surprising. Caesarean sections have been recommended to prevent the mother-to-child transmission (PMTCT) of HIV in many regions, [64], [65] and the most common indication for caesarean section in HIV-infected women in the studies reviewed was PMTCT of HIV (data not shown). It is possible that clinicians, particularly in low income countries, weigh the health risks associated with caesarean sections against those of PMTCT, and are perhaps more cautious about performing caesarean sections in HIV-infected women. Although recent guidelines recommend that women with very low viral loads who are on ART do not need a caesarean for PMTCT of HIV [66] we would expect a higher rate of caesareans amongst HIV-infected women in high-income countries given the time period in which the studies were conducted. Stratifying the meta-analysis by high and low income countries did not alter the findings (data not shown). We did not systematically review the literature to assess the association between HIV and caesarean sections, however, and some studies may have been missed.

This review was comprehensive covering a long time period with no restriction on language, world region or type of study. The studies found were predominantly conducted in tertiary health facilities, however, resulting in the enrolment of a higher risk group of pregnant women. While this will lead to an overestimation in the frequency of obstetric complications, it is unlikely this will have affected the relative odds comparing HIV-infected and uninfected women. The main limitation of this review is the poor quality of included studies, none of which were classified as at low risk of bias across all the quality components. Notably, only 25 data sets controlled for key confounders, either through matching HIV-infected and uninfected women or through adjustment in the analysis. Furthermore, very few studies provided information on how the obstetric complications were defined or ascertained. Whether the risks and stigma associated with HIV may result in health professionals reporting complications differentially in HIV-infected and uninfected women is not known, but information bias certainly needs considering. Unfortunately, due to the limited number of studies included in this review, it was not possible to tease out the effect of ART by restricting analyses to studies conducted when ART was available.

HIV-infected women are thought to be eight times more likely to die in pregnancy or the postpartum than HIV-uninfected women, [67], [68] and the excess mortality attributable to HIV among HIV-infected women is about 994 per 100,000 pregnant women [67]. While the increased risk of puerperal sepsis and endometritis in HIV-infected women contributes to this, direct obstetric causes only explain a tiny fraction of the excess mortality. Studies on the causes of death in pregnant or postpartum women by HIV status are scarce, except for the South African confidential enquiries, the most recent of which cover 2,756 and 1,149 maternal deaths in HIV-infected and uninfected women respectively [60]. The 2008–2010 confidential enquiries suggest that most deaths in HIV-infected pregnant and postpartum women are due to non-pregnancy-related infections, including pneumonia, tuberculosis and meningitis [60]. Although anaemia is thought to be exacerbated by HIV, [7] the confidential enquiries find a similar proportion of maternal deaths attributable to severe anaemia in HIV-infected and uninfected women (8% and 10% respectively) [60].

It is essential to ensure that both HIV-infected and uninfected pregnant woman have ready access to high quality antenatal and delivery services to correctly diagnose and manage direct obstetric complications when they occur. HIV-infected pregnant women will also benefit from prophylactic antibiotics during labour to reduce their risk of intrauterine infections [69]. However, given that most of the excess mortality associated with HIV in pregnancy is directly related to HIV rather than to a higher risk of obstetric complications, the greatest impact on pregnancy-related mortality will come from ensuring that HIV-infected pregnant women have adequate access to ART [70]. The World Health Organization recommends the provision of lifelong ART treatment for all HIV-infected pregnant women with a CD4 count below 350 cells/mm3, but many countries are still transitioning to these guidelines [71], [72]. Scaling up Option B+, where all pregnant mothers start ART regardless of their CD4 cell count and then continue taking it for life, has been proposed as an additional strategy to benefit maternal health; however, any benefit must be carefully measured against the potential pitfalls which include the high financial costs of such a programme and possible poor adherence to ART amongst women who perceive themselves to be healthy [73].

Supporting Information

Figure S1.

Funnel plot illustrating potential publication bias for data sets which look at the association between HIV and pre-eclampsia.



File S1.

Search Strategy.




The authors would like to thank Christopher Grollman for screening a 20% sample of abstracts and Alma Adler, Lenka Benova, John Bradley, Francesca Cavallaro, Elisabeth Eckersberger, Krystyna Makowiecka, Toshie Mizunuma, Cristina Moya and Ting Wang for their help translating articles.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: CC CR. Performed the experiments: CC. Analyzed the data: CC. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: CC. Wrote the paper: CC CR.


  1. 1. Abdool-Karim Q, AbouZahr C, Dehne K, Mangiaterra V, Moodley J, et al. (2010) HIV and maternal mortality: turning the tide. The Lancet 375: 1948–1949.
  2. 2. McIntyre J (2003) Mothers infected with HIV: Reducing maternal death and disability during pregnancy. British Medical Bulletin 67: 127–135.
  3. 3. Lindgren S, Martin C, Anzen B, Strand H, Bredberg-Raden U, et al. (1996) Pattern of HIV viraemia and CD4 levels in relation to pregnancy in HIV-1 infected women. Scand J Infect Dis 28: 425–433.
  4. 4. Rich KC, Siegel JN, Jennings C, Rydman RJ, Landay AL (1995) CD4+ lymphocytes in perinatal human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection: evidence for pregnancy-induced immune depression in uninfected and HIV-infected women. J Infect Dis 172: 1221–1227.
  5. 5. French R, Brocklehurst P (1998) The effect of pregnancy on survival in women infected with HIV a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology 105: 827–835.
  6. 6. Verkuyl DAA (1995) Practising obstetrics and gynaecology in areas with a high prevalence of HIV infection. The Lancet 346: 293–296.
  7. 7. Berer M (1999) HIV/AIDS, pregnancy and maternal mortality and morbidity: implications for care. Safe Motherhood initiatives: critical issues, edited by Marge Berer and TK Sundari Ravindran: Oxford, England, Blackwell Science 1999: 198–210.
  8. 8. Graham W, Hussein J (2003) Measuring and estimating maternal mortality in the era of HIV/AIDS. Workshop on HIV/AIDS and Adult mortality in developing countries. New York: Population Division.
  9. 9. KS M (2003) Childbirth Education for the HIV-Positive Woman. J Perinat Educ 12: 16–26.
  10. 10. Turan JM, Bukusi EA, Cohen CR, Sande J, Miller S (2008) Effects of HIV/AIDS on Maternity Care Providers in Kenya. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, & Neonatal Nursing 37: 588–595.
  11. 11. Higgens JPT, Green S (2011) Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions, version 5.1.0. Updated March 2011 ed: The Cochrane Collaboration.
  12. 12. Begg C, Mazumdar M (1994) Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias. Biometrics 50: 1088–1101.
  13. 13. Suy A, Martinez E, Coll O, Lonca M, Palacio M, et al. (2006) Increased risk of pre-eclampsia and fetal death in HIV-infected pregnant women receiving highly active antiretroviral therapy. AIDS 20: 59–66.
  14. 14. Maiques V, Garcia-Tejedor A, Diago V, Molina JM, Borras D, et al. (2010) Perioperative cesarean delivery morbidity among HIV-infected women under highly active antiretroviral treatment: a case-control study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 153: 27–31.
  15. 15. Maiques-Montesinos V, Cervera-Sanchez J, Bellver-Pradas J, Abad-Carrascosa A, Serra-Serra V (1999) Post-cesarean section morbidity in HIV-positive women. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 78: 789–792.
  16. 16. Azria E, Kane A, Tsatsaris V, Schmitz T, Launay O, et al. (2010) Term labor management and outcomes in treated HIV-infected women without contraindications to vaginal delivery and matched controls. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 111: 161–164.
  17. 17. Wimalasundera RC, Larbalestier N, Smith JH, de Ruiter A, Mc GTSA, et al. (2002) Pre-eclampsia, antiretroviral therapy, and immune reconstitution. Lancet 360: 1152–1154.
  18. 18. Grubert TA, Reindell D, Kastner R, Lutz-Friedrich R, Belohradsky BH, et al. (1999) Complications after caesarean section in HIV-1-infected women not taking antiretroviral treatment. Lancet 354: 1612–1613.
  19. 19. Boer K, Nellen JF, Patel D, Timmermans S, Tempelman C, et al. (2007) The AmRo study: pregnancy outcome in HIV-1-infected women under effective highly active antiretroviral therapy and a policy of vaginal delivery. BJOG 114: 148–155.
  20. 20. Semprini AE, Castagna C, Ravizza M, Fiore S, Savasi V, et al. (1995) The incidence of complications after caesarean section in 156 HIV-positive women. AIDS 9: 913–917.
  21. 21. Haeri S, Shauer M, Dale M, Leslie J, Baker AM, et al.. (2009) Obstetric and newborn infant outcomes in human immunodeficiency virus-infected women who receive highly active antiretroviral therapy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 201: 315 e311–315.
  22. 22. Kourtis AP, Bansil P, McPheeters M, Meikle SF, Posner SF, et al. (2006) Hospitalizations of pregnant HIV-infected women in the USA prior to and during the era of HAART, 1994–2003. AIDS 20: 1823–1831.
  23. 23. Louis J, Buhari MA, Allen D, Gonik B, Jones TB (2006) Postpartum morbidity associated with advanced HIV disease. Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol 2006: 79512.
  24. 24. Minkoff HL, Henderson C, Mendez H, Gail MH, Holman S, et al. (1990) Pregnancy outcomes among mothers infected with human immunodeficiency virus and uninfected control subjects. Am J Obstet Gynecol 163: 1598–1604.
  25. 25. Cavasin H, Dola T, Uribe O, Biswas M, Do M, et al. (2009) Postoperative infectious morbidities of cesarean delivery in human immunodeficiency virus-infected women. Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol 2009: 827405.
  26. 26. Louis J, Landon MB, Gersnoviez RJ, Leveno KJ, Spong CY, et al. (2007) Perioperative morbidity and mortality among human immunodeficiency virus-infected women undergoing cesarean delivery. Obstetrics and Gynecology 110: 385–390.
  27. 27. Rodriguez EJ, Spann C, Jamieson D, Lindsay M (2001) Postoperative morbidity associated with cesarean delivery among human immunodeficiency virus-seropositive women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 184: 1108–1111.
  28. 28. Figueroa-Damian R (1999) Pregnancy outcome in women infected with the human immunodeficiency virus. Salud publica de Mexico 41: 362–367.
  29. 29. Roman-Poueriet J, Fernandez AD, Beck-Sague CM, Szabo RG, Mercedes F, et al. (2009) HIV infection and prevention of mother-tochild transmission in childbearing women: La romana, Dominican republic, 2002-2006. Revista Panamericana de Salud Publica/Pan American Journal of Public Health 26: 315–323.
  30. 30. Peret FJ, Melo VH, de Paula LB, de Andrade BA, Pinto JA (2007) Puerperal morbidity in HIV-infected and non-infected women. Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetricia 29: 260–266.
  31. 31. Mattar R, Amed AM, Lindsey PC, Sass N, Daher S (2004) Preeclampsia and HIV infection. European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Biology 117: 240–241.
  32. 32. Braddick MR, Kreiss JK, Embree JB, Datta P, Ndinya-Achola JO, et al. (1990) Impact of maternal HIV infection on obstetrical and early neonatal outcome. AIDS 4: 1001–1005.
  33. 33. van Eijk AM, Ayisi JG, Slutsker L, Ter Kuile FO, Rosen DH, et al. (2007) Effect of haematinic supplementation and malaria prevention on maternal anaemia and malaria in western Kenya. Trop Med Int Health 12: 342–352.
  34. 34. Waweru J, Mugenda O, Kuria E (2009) Anemia in the context of pregnancy and HIV/AIDS: a case of Pumwani Maternity Hospital in Nairobi, Kenya. African Journal of Food, Agriculture, Nutrition and Development 9: 748–763.
  35. 35. Temmerman M, Chomba EN, Ndinya-Achola J, Plummer FA, Coppens M, et al. (1994) Maternal human immunodeficiency virus-1 infection and pregnancy outcome. Obstet Gynecol 83: 495–501.
  36. 36. Chamiso D (1996) Pregnancy outcome in HIV-1 positive women in Gandhi Memorial Hospital Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. East Afr Med J 73: 805–809.
  37. 37. Leroy V, Ladner J, Nyiraziraje M, De Clercq A, Bazubagira A, et al. (1998) Effect of HIV-1 infection on pregnancy outcome in women in Kigali, Rwanda, 1992-1994. Pregnancy and HIV Study Group. AIDS 12: 643–650.
  38. 38. Lepage P, Dabis F, Hitimana DG, Msellati P, Van Goethem C, et al. (1991) Perinatal transmission of HIV-1: lack of impact of maternal HIV infection on characteristics of livebirths and on neonatal mortality in Kigali, Rwanda. AIDS 5: 295–300.
  39. 39. Mmiro F, Ndugwa C, Guay L, Hom D, Ball P, et al. (1993) Effect of human immunodeficiency virus-1 infection on the outcome of pregnancy in Ugandan women. Pediatric AIDS and HIV Infection 4: 67–73.
  40. 40. Wandabwa J, Doyle P, Todd J, Kiondo P, Wandabwa MA, et al. (2008) Risk factors for ruptured uterus in Mulago hospital Kampala, Uganda. East Afr Med J 85: 56–63.
  41. 41. Okong P, Biryahwaho B, Bergstrom S (2004) Intrauterine infection after delivery: a marker of HIV-1 seropositivity among puerperal women in Uganda? Int J STD AIDS 15: 669–672.
  42. 42. Olagbuji BN, Ezeanochie MC, Ande AB, Oboro VO (2009) Obstetric and perinatal outcome in HIV positive women receiving HAART in urban Nigeria. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 281.
  43. 43. Onah HE, Obi SN, Agbata TA, Oguanuo TC (2007) Pregnancy outcome in HIV-positive women in Enugu, Nigeria. J Obstet Gynaecol 27: 271–274.
  44. 44. Chama CM, Morrupa JY (2008) The safety of elective caesarean section for the prevention of mother-to-child transmission of HIV-1. J Obstet Gynaecol 28: 194–197.
  45. 45. Zvandasara P, Saungweme G, Mlambo JT, Moyo J (2007) Post Caesarean section infective morbidity in HIV-positive women at a tertiary training hospital in Zimbabwe. Cent Afr J Med 53: 43–47.
  46. 46. de Groot MR, Corporaal LJ, Cronje HS, Joubert G (2003) HIV infection in critically ill obstetrical patients. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 81: 9–16.
  47. 47. Bodkin C, Klopper H, Langley G (2006) A comparison of HIV positive and negative pregnant women at a public sector hospital in South Africa. J Clin Nurs 15: 735–741.
  48. 48. Frank KA, Buchmann EJ, Schackis RC (2004) Does human immunodeficiency virus infection protect against preeclampsia-eclampsia? Obstet Gynecol 104: 238–242.
  49. 49. Moodliar S, Moodley J, Esterhuizen TM (2007) Complications associated with caesarean delivery in a setting with high HIV prevalence rates. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 131: 138–145.
  50. 50. Urbani G, de Vries MM, Cronje HS, Niemand I, Bam RH, et al. (2001) Complications associated with cesarean section in HIV-infected patients. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 74: 9–15.
  51. 51. Lionel J, Aleyamma TK, Varghese L, Buck J, Gopalakrishnan G, et al. (2008) HIV and obstetric complications and fetal outcomes in Vellore, India. Trop Doct 38: 144–146.
  52. 52. Singh YA, Usham R, Devi SR, Singh LR, Sangeeta N, et al. (2009) Foeto-maternal outcome in HIV infected women and measures to prevent parent-to-child transmission of HIV. JMS Journal of Medical Society 23: 116–120.
  53. 53. Chanrachakul B, Herabutya Y, Panburana P (2001) Active management of labor: is it suitable for a developing country? Int J Gynaecol Obstet 72: 229–234.
  54. 54. Panburana P, Phaupradit W, Tantisirin O, Sriintravanit N, Buamuenvai J (2003) Maternal complications after Caesarean section in HIV infected pregnant women. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 43: 160–163.
  55. 55. Fiore S, Newell ML, Thorne C (2004) Higher rates of post-partum complications in HIV-infected than in uninfected women irrespective of mode of delivery. AIDS 18: 933–938.
  56. 56. Aboud S, Msamanga G, Read JS, Wang L, Mfalila C, et al. (2009) Effect of prenatal and perinatal antibiotics on maternal health in Malawi, Tanzania, and Zambia. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics 107: 202–207.
  57. 57. van Dillen J, Zwart J, Schutte J, van Roosmalen J (2010) Maternal sepsis: epidemiology, etiology and outcome. Current Opinion in Infectious Diseases 23: 249–254 210.1097/QCO.1090b1013e328339257c.
  58. 58. Wasserheit JN (1992) Epidemiological synergy. Interrelationships between human immunodeficiency virus infection and other sexually transmitted diseases. Sexually transmitted diseases 19: 61–77.
  59. 59. Clottey C, Dallabetta G (1993) Sexually transmitted diseases and human immunodeficiency virus. Epidemiologic synergy? Infectious disease clinics of North America 7: 753–770.
  60. 60. NCCMED (2012) Saving Mothers 2008–2010: Fifth Report on Confidential Enquiries into Maternal Deaths in South Africa.
  61. 61. Sloand EM, Klein HG, Banks SM, Vareldzis B, Merritt S, et al. (1992) Epidemiology of thrombocytopenia in HIV inlection. European Journal of Haematology 48: 168–172.
  62. 62. Rossi G, Gorla R, Stellini R, Franceschini F, Bettinzioli M, et al. (1990) Prevalence, clinical, and laboratory features of thrombocytopenia among HIV-infected individuals. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses 6: 261–269.
  63. 63. Scaradavou A (2002) HIV-related thrombocytopenia. Blood Reviews 16: 73–76.
  64. 64. The Internation Perinatal HIV Group (1999) The Mode of Delivery and the Risk of Vertical Transmission of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 – A Meta-Analysis of 15 Prospective Cohort Studies. New England Journal of Medicine 340: 977–987.
  65. 65. National Institute for Clinical Excellence (2004) Clinical Guideline 13: Caesarean section. London: National Institute for Clinical Excellence.
  66. 66. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (2011) Caesarean Section. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence.
  67. 67. Calvert C, Ronsmans C (2013) The contribution of hiv to pregnancy-related mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis. AIDS Publish Ahead of Print: 10.1097/QAD.1090b1013e32835fd32940.
  68. 68. Zaba B, Calvert C, Marston M, Isingo R, Nakiyingi J, et al. (Forthcoming) The impact of HIV on pregnany-related mortality in sub-Saharan Africa: empirical evidence from the ALPHA network of HIV community-based studies. The Lancet.
  69. 69. Sebitloane HM, Moodley J, Esterhuizen TM (2008) Prophylactic antibiotics for the prevention of postpartum infectious morbidity in women infected with human immunodeficiency virus: a randomized controlled trial. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 198: 189.e181–189.e186.
  70. 70. World Health Organization (2010) Antiretroviral therapy for HIV infection in adults and adolescents. World Health Organization.
  71. 71. World Health Organization (2010) Antiretroviral drugs for treating pregnant women and preventing HIV infections in infants: recommendations for a public health approach, 2010 version. Geneva.
  72. 72. UNAIDS (2011) Countdown to zero: Global plan towards the elimination of new HIV infections among children by 2015 and keeping their mothers alive. Geneva: UNAIDS.
  73. 73. Coutsoudis A, Goga A, Desmond C, Barron P, Black V, et al. Is Option B+ the best choice? The Lancet 381: 269–271.
  74. 74. Higgins JR, de Swiet M (2001) Blood-pressure measurement and classification in pregnancy. The Lancet 357: 131–135.
  75. 75. Chilongozi D, Wang L, Brown L, Taha T, Valentine M, et al.. (2008) Morbidity and Mortality Among a Cohort of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1-Infected and Uninfected Pregnant Women and Their Infants From Malawi, Zambia, and Tanzania. The Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal 27: 808–814 810.1097/INF.1090b1013e31817109a31817104​.