Advertisement
Pearls

Oral Bacteria and Cancer

  • Sarah E. Whitmore,

    Affiliation: Center for Oral Health and Systemic Disease, School of Dentistry, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky, United States of America

    X
  • Richard J. Lamont mail

    rich.lamont@louisville.edu

    Affiliation: Center for Oral Health and Systemic Disease, School of Dentistry, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky, United States of America

    X
  • Published: March 27, 2014
  • DOI: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1003933
  • Published in PLOS Pathogens

Epidemiological Associations

Over a number of years, epidemiological studies established several well-defined risk factors for cancer, including age, heredity, diet, tobacco use, chronic viral infections, and inflammation. Paradoxically, the success of these studies left little room for incorporation of any new factors or causative agents, and, consequently, the idea that a bacterial infection could contribute to cancer was generally disregarded. However, landmark studies in the early 1990s established Helicobacter pylori as a causative agent of gastric cancers, resulting in a paradigm shift regarding the relationship between microbial agents and cancers [1]. Indeed, in 1994, H. pylori became the first bacterial species to be officially recognized by the World Health Organization as a definite cause of cancer in humans. Since then, there has been a growing body of evidence supporting an association between specific microorganisms, including those in the oral cavity, and various types of cancers.

The oral cavity is inhabited by complex multispecies communities that usually exist in a balanced immunoinflammatory state with the host [2]. Certain species, such as Porphyromonas gingivalis, can disrupt this equilibrium, resulting in a dysbiotic host–microbiota interaction. Subsequently, other community constituents, such as Fusobacterium nucleatum, can become opportunistically pathogenic, and the combined effect of a dysbiotic microbial community along with a dysregulated immune response ultimately causes periodontal disease [2]. These well-studied periodontal organisms have now emerged as the focal point for the developing association between oral bacteria and cancer.

Perhaps the most likely carcinogenic link with oral bacteria is with oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC), one of the most common cancers worldwide. OSCC surfaces have been reported to harbor significantly higher levels of Porphyromonas and Fusobacterium compared with contiguous healthy mucosa [3]. Moreover, immunohistochemistry with P. gingivalis antibodies revealed higher levels of detection and intensity of staining in gingival carcinomas compared with healthy gingival tissue, although only a small number of cases were examined [4]. A striking association has also been demonstrated between P. gingivalis infection and pancreatic cancer. In a prospective cohort study of over 400 cases and controls, a >2-fold increase in risk of pancreatic cancer was observed among those with high levels of antibodies to P. gingivalis, after adjusting for known risk factors [5]. Similarly, in the extensive National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey III, orodigestive cancer mortality was found to be related to the levels of P. gingivalis antibodies, independent of periodontal disease [6]. Several recent studies have shown a strong association between F. nucleatum and colorectal cancer (CRC) [7][10]. F. nucleatum was found to be one of the more abundant species within and around CRC neoplasms, and levels of F. nucleatum correlated with the presence of lymph node metastases.

Mechanistic Basis Supporting a Role for Oral Bacteria in Cancer

Epidemiological studies associate oral bacteria temporally and spatially with certain cancers and render involvement in the initiation or progression of the disease plausible. However, it is equally plausible that early undetected cancer, or precancerous lesions, facilitate the colonization and growth of oral bacteria. If these organisms are active participants in the disease process, then a mechanistic basis that would support an etiological role should exist.

Chronic or dysregulated inflammation has long been appreciated as contributing to tumor development, in part through modulation of the tumor microenvironment [11]. Both P. gingivalis and F. nucleatum establish chronic infections that involve intracellular persistence within epithelial cells, can spread systemically and cause extra-oral infections, and have well-characterized immune disruptive properties [12]. F. nucleatum is strongly proinflammatory, and McCoy et al. [7] demonstrated a positive correlation between mRNA levels for several local cytokines and Fusobacterium species in CRC cases. Furthermore, in the ApcMin/+ mouse model of intestinal tumorigenesis, F. nucleatum recruits tumor-infiltrating immune cells, thus generating a proinflammatory microenvironment that is conducive for CRC progression [13]. The inflammatory properties of P. gingivalis are more nuanced, and the organism can exhibit both pro- and anti-inflammatory properties, depending on the context [14], [15]. In either event, P. gingivalis has a major disruptive effect on local immune responses in the periodontal area [2]; however, the possible link with tumor development has yet to be investigated in molecular detail. In addition to broadly based immune-disruptive properties, both P. gingivalis and F. nucleatum impinge upon several aspects of epithelial cell signaling that have relevance to cancer progression.

P. gingivalis

Cancer cells, by definition, are defective in functional cell death pathways, and tumorigenesis is initiated when cells are freed from growth restraints. Epithelial cell responses to P. gingivalis infection include both changes to apoptosis and cell division (Figure 1). In primary cultures of gingival epithelial cells, P. gingivalis is strongly antiapoptotic and, indeed, can suppress chemically induced apoptosis [16]. P. gingivalis activates Jak1/Akt/Stat3 signaling that controls intrinsic mitochondrial apoptosis pathways [16], [17]. At the mitochondrial membrane, the activity of proapoptotic Bad is inhibited, and the Bcl2 (antiapoptotic):Bax (proapoptotic) ratio is increased, consequently curtailing the release of the apoptosis effector cytochrome c [18]. Further downstream, activation of both caspase-9 and the executioner caspase-3 is blocked. Remarkably, P. gingivalis possesses multiple mechanisms for inhibition of apoptosis in epithelial cells. Expression of microRNAs (miRs) is modulated, and up-regulation of miR-203 leads to inhibition of the negative regulator SOCS3 and subsequent suppression of apoptosis [19]. P. gingivalis secretes a nucleoside diphosphate kinase (NDK), which can function as an ATPase and prevent ATP-dependent apoptosis mediated through the purinergic receptor P2X7 [20]. Another potential role for NDK is diminishing ATP activation of P2X7 receptors on dendritic cells, which will impede activation of the NLRP3/ASC/caspase-1 inflammasome. This, in turn, will reduce secretion of IL-1β, which is important for the priming of IFNγ-producing tumor–antigen-specific CD8+ T cells [21]. In concert with suppression of apoptosis, P. gingivalis can accelerate progression through the S-phase of the cell cycle by manipulation of cyclin/CDK (cyclin-dependent kinase) activity and reducing the level of the p53 tumor suppressor [22]. A fimbrial-deficient mutant of P. gingivalis does not display this activity, suggestive of a role for the FimA adhesin in elevating epithelial cell proliferation. A role for LPS (lipopolysaccharide) in the dysregulation of p53 has been established [23], and the extent to which P. gingivalis LPS can target p53 requires further investigation.

thumbnail

Figure 1. Interactions between P. gingivalis and epithelial cells that could produce an oncogenic phenotype.

Extracellular P. gingivalis secrete gingipains, which activate Protease Activated Receptor (PAR) leading to promatrix metalloprotease (MMP)-9 production, and they also convert proMMP-9 to mature MMP-9, along with nucleoside diphosphate kinase (NDK), which cleaves ATP and prevents activation of the proapoptotic P2X7 receptor. Intracellular P. gingivalis activate antiapoptotic Jak-Stat signaling and inhibit expression of the p53 tumor suppressor. Additionally, Erk 1/2 and p38 are activated, which also elevates proMMP-9 expression.

doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1003933.g001

In both primary gingival epithelial cells and OSCC cells, P. gingivalis can induce the expression of the B7-H1 and B7-DC receptors [24]. These receptors are up-regulated in cells originating from a variety of cancers and contribute to chronic inflammation. Furthermore, B7-H1 expression promotes the development of regulatory T cells (Treg), which suppress effector T cells, and thus could contribute to immune evasion by oral cancers. Another impact of P. gingivalis on OSCC cells is in promoting cellular invasion. P. gingivalis infection activates the ERK1/2-Ets1, p38/HSP27, and PAR2/NF-ΚB pathways to induce promatrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-9 expression [25]. Gingipains, cysteine proteinases produced by P. gingivalis, play a dual role in this process. They both engage the PAR2 receptor and cleave the MMP-9 proenzyme into the mature active form. MMP-9 degrades basement membrane and extracellular matrix, which promotes carcinoma cell migration and invasion, thus allowing carcinoma cells to enter the lymphatic system and blood vessels for dissemination and metastatic growth at remote sites. In this manner, P. gingivalis may contribute to OSCC metastasis.

F. nucleatum

Epithelial cell responses to F. nucleatum infection are also consistent with carcinogenesis (Figure 2). Signaling molecules targeted by F. nucleatum include kinases involved in cell cycle control, and, as a result, F. nucleatum can elevate cell proliferation and migration [26]. F. nucleatum also activates p38, leading to the secretion of MMP-9 and MMP-13 (collagenase 3). Similar to MMP-9, MMP-13 plays an important role in tumor invasion and metastasis. Recently, a more direct relationship between F. nucleatum and CRC was demonstrated whereby the fusobacterial adhesin FadA binds to E-cadherin on colon cancer cells and activates β-catenin signaling [27]. This pathway leads to increased transcriptional activity of oncogenes, Wnt, and pro-inflammatory cytokines, as well as stimulation of CRC cell proliferation. In vivo relevance was established by the finding that fadA gene levels in colon tissue from patients with CRC were >10-fold higher compared with normal individuals.

thumbnail

Figure 2. Interactions between F. nucleatum and epithelial cells that could produce an oncogenic phenotype.

Binding of the FadA adhesin to E-cadherin activates β-catenin signaling, resulting in activation of genes that control cell survival and proliferation. F. nucleatum also activates several cyclin dependent kinases (CDKs) and p38, which controls the production of matrix metalloproteases MMP-9 and MMP-13.

doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1003933.g002

Conclusions

Both P. gingivalis and F. nucleatum have attributes consistent with a role in cancer development and progression. The question then arises as to why the widespread infection with these organisms leads to disease in only a limited number of individuals. Part of the answer may relate to the community nature of oral infections and the potential constraining influence of other bacteria. However, another consideration is the multifactorial etiology of cancer, and, within this framework, specific oral bacteria and their associated inflammatory insults may play a contributory, but not exclusive, role.

The implications of oral bacterial involvement in cancer are many. The detection of P. gingivalis or F. nucleatum in precancerous lesions could be used as a poor prognosis indicator. Improved oral hygiene and treatment of periodontitis may be useful in limiting the development or spread of cancer. Finally, since well-characterized virulence factors of P. gingivalis and F. nucleatum, such as the FimA and FadA adhesins, may function as effector molecules in the transition of normal epithelial cells to cancerous cells, they may provide novel targets for therapeutic intervention.

Acknowledgments

We thank Drs. Hajishengallis and Abe (University of Pennsylvania) for their assistance.

References

  1. 1. Kim SS, Ruiz VE, Carroll JD, Moss SF (2011) Helicobacter pylori in the pathogenesis of gastric cancer and gastric lymphoma. Cancer Lett 305: 228–238. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2010.07.014
  2. 2. Hajishengallis G, Lamont RJ (2012) Beyond the red complex and into more complexity: The polymicrobial synergy and dysbiosis (PSD) model of periodontal disease etiology. Mol Oral Microbiol 27: 409–419. doi: 10.1111/j.2041-1014.2012.00663.x
  3. 3. Nagy KN, Sonkodi I, Szoke I, Nagy E, Newman HN (1998) The microflora associated with human oral carcinomas. Oral Oncol 34: 304–308. doi: 10.1016/s1368-8375(98)80012-2
  4. 4. Katz J, Onate MD, Pauley KM, Bhattacharyya I, Cha S (2011) Presence of Porphyromonas gingivalis in gingival squamous cell carcinoma. Int J Oral Sci 3: 209–215. doi: 10.4248/ijos11075
  5. 5. Michaud DS (2013) Role of bacterial infections in pancreatic cancer. Carcinogenesis 34: 2193–2197. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgt249
  6. 6. Ahn J, Segers S, Hayes RB (2012) Periodontal disease, Porphyromonas gingivalis serum antibody levels and orodigestive cancer mortality. Carcinogenesis 33: 1055–1058. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgs112
  7. 7. McCoy AN, Araujo-Perez F, Azcarate-Peril A, Yeh JJ, Sandler RS, et al. (2013) Fusobacterium is associated with colorectal adenomas. PLOS One 8: e53653. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0053653
  8. 8. Castellarin M, Warren RL, Freeman JD, Dreolini L, Krzywinski M, et al. (2012) Fusobacterium nucleatum infection is prevalent in human colorectal carcinoma. Genome Res 22: 299–306. doi: 10.1101/gr.126516.111
  9. 9. Kostic AD, Gevers D, Pedamallu CS, Michaud M, Duke F, et al. (2012) Genomic analysis identifies association of Fusobacterium with colorectal carcinoma. Genome Res 22: 292–298. doi: 10.1101/gr.126573.111
  10. 10. Chen W, Liu F, Ling Z, Tong X, Xiang C (2012) Human intestinal lumen and mucosa-associated microbiota in patients with colorectal cancer. PLOS One 7: e39743. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0039743
  11. 11. Rakoff-Nahoum S (2006) Why cancer and inflammation? Yale J Biol Med 79: 123–130.
  12. 12. Han YW, Wang X (2013) Mobile microbiome: oral bacteria in extra-oral infections and inflammation. J Dent Res 92: 485–491. doi: 10.1177/0022034513487559
  13. 13. Kostic AD, Chun E, Robertson L, Glickman JN, Gallini CA, et al. (2013) Fusobacterium nucleatum potentiates intestinal tumorigenesis and modulates the tumor-immune microenvironment. Cell Host Microbe 14: 207–215. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2013.07.007
  14. 14. Takeuchi H, Hirano T, Whitmore SE, Morisaki I, Amano A, et al. (2013) The serine phosphatase SerB of Porphyromonas gingivalis suppresses IL-8 production by dephosphorylation of NF-kappaB RelA/p65. PLOS Pathog 9: e1003326. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1003326
  15. 15. Lamont RJ, Jenkinson HF (1998) Life below the gum line: Pathogenic mechanisms of Porphyromonas gingivalis. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 62: 1244–1263.
  16. 16. Mao S, Park Y, Hasegawa Y, Tribble GD, James CE, et al. (2007) Intrinsic apoptotic pathways of gingival epithelial cells modulated by Porphyromonas gingivalis. Cell Microbiol 9: 1997–2007. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2007.00931.x
  17. 17. Yilmaz O, Jungas T, Verbeke P, Ojcius DM (2004) Activation of the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/Akt pathway contributes to survival of primary epithelial cells infected with the periodontal pathogen Porphyromonas gingivalis. Infect Immun 72: 3743–3751. doi: 10.1128/iai.72.7.3743-3751.2004
  18. 18. Yao L, Jermanus C, Barbetta B, Choi C, Verbeke P, et al. (2010) Porphyromonas gingivalis infection sequesters pro-apoptotic Bad through Akt in primary gingival epithelial cells. Mol Oral Microbiol 25: 89–101. doi: 10.1111/j.2041-1014.2010.00569.x
  19. 19. Moffatt CE, Lamont RJ (2011) Porphyromonas gingivalis induction of microRNA-203 expression controls suppressor of cytokine signaling 3 in gingival epithelial cells. Infect Immun 79: 2632–2637. doi: 10.1128/iai.00082-11
  20. 20. Yilmaz O, Yao L, Maeda K, Rose TM, Lewis EL, et al. (2008) ATP scavenging by the intracellular pathogen Porphyromonas gingivalis inhibits P2X7-mediated host-cell apoptosis. Cell Microbiol 10: 863–875. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2007.01089.x
  21. 21. Aymeric L, Apetoh L, Ghiringhelli F, Tesniere A, Martins I, et al. (2010) Tumor cell death and ATP release prime dendritic cells and efficient anticancer immunity. Cancer Res 70: 855–858. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-09-3566
  22. 22. Kuboniwa M, Hasegawa Y, Mao S, Shizukuishi S, Amano A, et al. (2008) P. gingivalis accelerates gingival epithelial cell progression through the cell cycle. Microbes Infect 10: 122–128. doi: 10.1016/j.micinf.2007.10.011
  23. 23. Tang X, Asano M, O'Reilly A, Farquhar A, Yang Y, et al. (2012) p53 is an important regulator of CCL2 gene expression. Curr Mol Med 12: 929–943. doi: 10.2174/156652412802480844
  24. 24. Groeger S, Domann E, Gonzales JR, Chakraborty T, Meyle J (2011) B7-H1 and B7-DC receptors of oral squamous carcinoma cells are upregulated by Porphyromonas gingivalis. Immunobiology 216: 1302–1310. doi: 10.1016/j.imbio.2011.05.005
  25. 25. Inaba H, Sugita H, Kuboniwa M, Iwai S, Hamada M, et al. (2013) Porphyromonas gingivalis promotes invasion of oral squamous cell carcinoma through induction of proMMP9 and its activation. Cell Microbiol 16: 131–145. doi: 10.1111/cmi.12211
  26. 26. Uitto VJ, Baillie D, Wu Q, Gendron R, Grenier D, et al. (2005) Fusobacterium nucleatum increases collagenase 3 production and migration of epithelial cells. Infect Immun 73: 1171–1179. doi: 10.1128/iai.73.2.1171-1179.2005
  27. 27. Rubinstein MR, Wang X, Liu W, Hao Y, Cai G, et al. (2013) Fusobacterium nucleatum promotes colorectal carcinogenesis by modulating E-cadherin/beta-catenin signaling via its FadA adhesin. Cell Host Microbe 14: 195–206. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2013.07.012